<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some notes on writing and method</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00152.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00152.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth VC</title>
		<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00152.html#comment-2048</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth VC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/2005/11/some-notes-on-writing-and-method/#comment-2048</guid>
		<description>Well, let's pose a different question: to what extent can you yourself take your characterisation on trust?  One of the great things about systematic methods is that they can make you discard your first impression and get a deeper reading of the text.  In my opinion, at least.

I think the fractalness disappears somewhat when you begin to write, as well.  You'll find that things naturally group themselves together somewhat.

So, tell: what did you find out?

Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, let&#8217;s pose a different question: to what extent can you yourself take your characterisation on trust?  One of the great things about systematic methods is that they can make you discard your first impression and get a deeper reading of the text.  In my opinion, at least.</p>
<p>I think the fractalness disappears somewhat when you begin to write, as well.  You&#8217;ll find that things naturally group themselves together somewhat.</p>
<p>So, tell: what did you find out?</p>
<p>Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
