<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do frequently visited online articles become frequently cited journal articles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/0022.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/0022.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wainer</title>
		<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/0022.html#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Wainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/2004/12/do-frequently-visited-online-articles-become-frequently-cited-journal-articles/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Short shory from personal site: we have some 15 papers on a site we use for disemination of results (ipop.org.uk). I monitor downloads. Each paper gets downloaded an average of 20 times a week: 20 times a week !! Impact factor so far, for published material? Well, let's talk about something else, please. Sure, it takes time. But alas, I reckon that different disciplines may have different 'conversion rates'. Just a though, very interesting topic by the by. Greetings, Wainer (BTW, Elizabeth, have you heard that search engines under-sample older material? ((Paul Wouters's research))  That mihgt negatively impact on citation scores? The contrary as citation indexes, as far as I'm aware)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short shory from personal site: we have some 15 papers on a site we use for disemination of results (ipop.org.uk). I monitor downloads. Each paper gets downloaded an average of 20 times a week: 20 times a week !! Impact factor so far, for published material? Well, let&#8217;s talk about something else, please. Sure, it takes time. But alas, I reckon that different disciplines may have different &#8216;conversion rates&#8217;. Just a though, very interesting topic by the by. Greetings, Wainer (BTW, Elizabeth, have you heard that search engines under-sample older material? ((Paul Wouters&#8217;s research))  That mihgt negatively impact on citation scores? The contrary as citation indexes, as far as I&#8217;m aware)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EVC</title>
		<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/0022.html#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>EVC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/2004/12/do-frequently-visited-online-articles-become-frequently-cited-journal-articles/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Can I just ask what led you to find this?

(and on a related note, citation analysis and search engines share some of the same mathematical bases, so I'm always hearing sutff about it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just ask what led you to find this?</p>
<p>(and on a related note, citation analysis and search engines share some of the same mathematical bases, so I&#8217;m always hearing sutff about it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
