<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Literature wanted: what does it feel like to use a computer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00234.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00234.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Smith</title>
		<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00234.html#comment-4199</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/2007/09/literature-wanted-what-does-it-feel-like-to-use-a-computer/#comment-4199</guid>
		<description>Rather old, but still wise:

Miller, J. Hillis. âstay! Speak. Speak. I Charge Thee to Speakâ, Culture Machine, 2000.  (reviewed 3 February 2005).

From something I wrote an age ago:

Digitally mediated interactions [are] a realm that is generally problematising our understandings of public and private. Literary theorist, J. Hillis Miller gives a somewhat cautionary account of how ânew technologies bring the unheimlich âotherâ into the privacy of the home. They are a frightening threat to traditional ideas of the self as unified and as properly living rooted in one dear particular culture-bound place, participating in a single national culture, firmly protected from any alien otherness. They are threatening also to our assumption that political action is based in a single topographical location, a given nation-state with its firm boundaries, its ethnic and cultural unity.â?


I'm not as concerned as him about this(!), but he nails the strangeness of being  alone and connected all at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather old, but still wise:</p>
<p>Miller, J. Hillis. âstay! Speak. Speak. I Charge Thee to Speakâ, Culture Machine, 2000.  (reviewed 3 February 2005).</p>
<p>From something I wrote an age ago:</p>
<p>Digitally mediated interactions [are] a realm that is generally problematising our understandings of public and private. Literary theorist, J. Hillis Miller gives a somewhat cautionary account of how ânew technologies bring the unheimlich âotherâ into the privacy of the home. They are a frightening threat to traditional ideas of the self as unified and as properly living rooted in one dear particular culture-bound place, participating in a single national culture, firmly protected from any alien otherness. They are threatening also to our assumption that political action is based in a single topographical location, a given nation-state with its firm boundaries, its ethnic and cultural unity.â?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not as concerned as him about this(!), but he nails the strangeness of being  alone and connected all at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/00234.html#comment-4200</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupblog.workasone.net/archives/2007/09/literature-wanted-what-does-it-feel-like-to-use-a-computer/#comment-4200</guid>
		<description>We are really following the same path... Turkle has something on the computer screen, I think,  and on a new generation thinking of computers as âpsychological machinesâ?. (i.e., interactive and opaque, like the human mind). It's been a while since I read it, though, I'll have to look it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are really following the same path&#8230; Turkle has something on the computer screen, I think,  and on a new generation thinking of computers as âpsychological machinesâ?. (i.e., interactive and opaque, like the human mind). It&#8217;s been a while since I read it, though, I&#8217;ll have to look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
