Archive for the 'General' Category

Future of Entertainment 2

Sunday, November 18th, 2007

The past two days I spent at MIT’s CMS’s conference ‘The Future of Entertainment 2′ bringing together top notch mobile, internet and entertainment professionals (MTV Networks, Yahoo!, TBS) to discuss where the entertainment industry is headed.

Transmedia is a hot topic - the development of content that can be delivered on many mediums is being used by both television shows and advertisers. Henry Jenkins discussed interactive television not just as clicking a button to be taken into an interactive on-screen experience, but instead as any form of interaction with a television show in the physical world, e.g. CSI’s involvement in Second Life.

I was especially impressed with the mobile media panel: Marc Davis, Yahoo!, Bob Schukai, Turner Broadcasting, Alice Kim, MTV Networks, Anmol Madan, MIT Media Lab

Alice Kim:
- How do we get compensated?
- How do we stay relevant to our userbase, which is very forward looking?

Marc Davis:
- In the next few years, 4 billion people with cell phones and wireless connections to each other
- Realtime sharing of video from billions of geolocated phones live
Anmol Madan:
- Computation models on how people share things in media
- Ultimate goal is to make all phone interfaces socially aware

Bob Schukai:
- 90% of our research is outside the US.
- The US is behind on mobile and broadband. Way behind
- We can learn a lot from other geographies

Also, ran into some familiar faces such as Laurie Baird (Turner) who introduced me to great other Turner folks, Todd Cunningham (MTV) and Jing Wang (MIT). Ended up at GamBit which is MIT’s terrific new research initiative to conduct digital games research. Oh, and heard a lot of FCC bashing… we may want to look into that a bit more…
All in all 2 great days!

(You can find detailed session reports here)

Wikipedia contribution - mass or elite activity? The question answered?!

Thursday, November 8th, 2007

Some new research I just heard about has set out to answer once and for all a key question for Web 2.0 fans and Wikipedia fans in particular. Are Wikipedia entries predominantly written by a small elite (as one of the founders, Jimmy Wales, has maintained) or are they written at least originally by a fairly broad spectrum of users (and then edited into shape by those elites, as Aaron Swartz maintains). Priedhorsky et al have introduced an additional lens through which to analyse the significance of contributors - who writes the words that get read the most on Wikipedia? It turns out (startlingly) that .1% of contributors produce nearly half the value as measured by number of words read. Of course one could poke holes in this metric of measurement as well - does the value of Wikipedia rest primarily on its ability to tell millions of people about Harry Potter (the third most popular page at the moment) or on its breadth? Nonetheless an interesting new data point to think about…

David Brake

Digital Natives project

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

If I were to be really cool I would say that I was among the first to join Friendster but moved to Myspace fairly early on when most of my friends-in-bands were totally ‘in’ to it (and ‘I’m here to help’). I would also say that I was invited to Joost beta (because I like to download stuff). I would also say that I’ve been ripping & burning lots of music and films from p2p’s early hay days (you have to get real about what you can take with you on the road). And although I brushed elbows with some big name record companies on this topic it didn’t refrain me from, all lovey dovey, r&b-ing. I would also say that I flirted with AIM, MSN and Yahoo Messenger but when a deceased friend kept reappearing on AIM it was time to go. I forgot my password for MSN (and gosh, I get fairly upset about Microsoft’s passport thing, so MSN got abandoned very fast) and Yahoo meant a blast from the past who kept on sending offline messages (’next!’ as they say in sheaux biz). I would also say that from the mid-1990s I taught myself some basic programming mambo jumbo and toyed with the idea of becoming a digital architect. It turned out that I had a short attention span. Never got into the hang of BBS. Yes, I do remember BBS. As a matter of fact, I stem from that period, from before when terms like ‘being networked’ and ‘digital’ seemed to become the norm for a lot of us; I know that there was no internet and no email for instance (well, for the common peeps like me). I guess these statements date me so to speak.

John Palfrey’s blog post on the Berkman Center’s project on Digital Natives raises the question who are actually these so-called Digital Natives? In his and Urs Gasser’s upcoming book ‘Born Digital’ (Basic Books, 2008) they explore and address an emerging global culture of connectivity, communication and content. Where the world is the network and the people the content… Where multi presence no longer differentiates between analogue players and the digital world. Are we then all Digital Natives? No. Are we all Born Digital? Heck, I’m not and even if I were, there would be no guarantee that I would be a Digital Native.

So, this is a discussion we’re having at the Berkman. What are the attributes? Age, culture, economics, etc. All of them? Who do they represent? What is its place in our day-to-day activities? I guess the main claim explored is the idea that connectivity and communal activities seems to be defining how people will live and work in times to come (a claim I’m critically assessing but will write about in due course). What are the implications for privacy? Safety? IP? Information quality? etc. And looking at sites like Google and Facebook where platforms are provided for us to connect (and create) we should ask ourselves how commonality here is really governed… And what that actually means from both user- and firm-centric perspectives.

So to tell you the truth: I have pimped my ‘all-features’ cell phone (truth be told that we usually lead separate lives). I would also say that I love taking pictures so possess more cameras than one might consider healthy, so transgressed into the bits & bytes of it (oftentimes end up with tears in my eyes and my good ol’ camera with real film in my hands). Aw my gawd. I’m an old fart (thank you, David Weinberger ;-).

Second Life survey

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007

You are invited to participate in an academic study on Second Life. We are interested in the innovation-related practices of Second Life members so we can study the composition and structure of the Second Life community and the extent to which members receive resources and support from Linden Lab and other members. The questions focus on information sources such as the Official Linden Blog and the forums, and Second Life features and tools so we can study the ways in which Linden Lab invites and supports Second Life residents to create in-world content and to further develop the Second Life platform through (close) contact with Second Life members.

Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. There are no foreseeable risks associated with this project. The survey takes approximately 20 minutes.

For your chance of winning one of the following amounts in Linden$ - L$10.000 (1x), L$5.000 (2x), L$3.000 (3x), L$2.500 (4x), L$1.000 (5x), L$500 (10x), L$250 (20x), L$100 (30x), L$10 (50x), you can fill out your email address at the end of survey. We will never use this information publicly.

If you have questions at any time about the survey or the procedures, you may contact Rocketgrrrl Tripp aka Shenja van der Graaf at a.c.vandergraaf@lse.ac.uk. For further information you can check http://personal.lse.ac.uk/vanderga/ where the results will be posted in due course.


Yes, I would like to take the survey!!!

What are average speaking speeds and typing speeds?

Sunday, January 28th, 2007

I have been thinking about a methodological issue - online interviewing vs face to face. One issue is simply the likely amount of data one can reasonably get from an interviewee in a given time. If the average Internet user’s typing speed is 30-40 words per minute (based entirely arbitrarily on what Microsoft seems to think an “average user” might achieve) while the average speed of normal speech is 280 word per minute (again only rather loosely sourced) then given the same time commitment from your interviewee you’ll only get about 15% as much typed info as you would get face to face. Of course there are a lot of other variables in there to help you decide what method to use but I would still be interested to know if anyone can provide proper citeable estimates of typical typing and speaking speeds to use as rules of thumb. It strikes me that differential typing speed might be an under-measured index of the digital divide as well…

David Brake

Gaming and modding

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

Currently I’m working on an academic study focusing on game developer Valve, its games and modding activities. I am really interested to hear from anyone who is playing games like Half Life, Counter Strike and Gary’s Mod - you can spill your beans in the game survey. The great thing is, is that you can win a cool T-shirt from snorgtees (a way to say thank you… or as a bribe perhaps!?).

I want to take this survey (because gaming is c00l)

***
I have been in touch with Valve about this research however I am not hired by Valve nor any other gaming companies to do this research. All questions and comments can be directed to Rocketgrrrl aka Shenja van der Graaf @ a [dot] c [dot] vandergraaf [at] lse [dot] ac [dot] uk or if you want to read more about my academic research and the results, go here (give me a few more months for the results… \../)

Film & media faculty can override DVD protections!

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

My colleague Jason Mittell at MIT wrote a very interesting post in the C3 newsletter that I will repost here:

If there is one issue where I feel the perspectives of academic researchers and educators greatly diverge with the interests and policies of the media industries (at least as publicly stated), it is copyright. The media industries have been aggressively framing their copyrights as owned property, demanding control over all uses and successfully lobbying for legislation to protect ownership rights over all others. Media scholars are typically both copyright holders and active users of copywritten materials, so we can (ideally) see the perspectives of both creators and users- - I certainly want to protect some rights to my writings, ensuring proper credit and (modest) compensation for using my work. But I am a dependent practitioner of fair use, the right to use copywritten material without permission for certain purposes such as criticism, parody, and education. Without fair use, I could not quote a book in my own research, show a clip from a television show in class, or assign students to make parodies of movie trailers, all practices that I see as integral parts of my role as a media scholar.

Traditionally, courts have protected such fair use rights over industry objections, but Congress managed to legislate around these rights in 1998 with the DMCA - this act mandated that users could not legally circumvent copy protections (like the DRM system on all commercial DVDs), even if the purpose was protected by fair use. As the film and television industries have switched to DVD as their only format, consumers were denied our fair use rights to make clips for educational use, backup discs in a personal collection, and create parody videos, escalating the hostility between media users and owners. As an educator, this restriction effectively says I can only teach material following the limits dictated by DVD technology. Thankfully, the U.S. Copyright Office last week issued a ruling allowing film & media faculty to override DVD protections to make in-class clips - a great allowance, but still one much more limited than fair use.

It has always struck me as exceedingly short-sighted for the industry to push for such clamping down of educational fair use, as media educators train the next generation of filmmakers, television programmers, advertising executives, and (most importantly) media consumers. Why would the industry want to restrict educational practices that primarily teach students how to consume and create the very products that they wish to sell? I see two potential explanations: the more distressing explanation is that the industry’s lawyers & owners believe that copywritten material is truly property that must be protected from all non-paying intruders, controlled at every turn, and consumers abilities to assert control of any potential uses is merely an inconvenience to be overcome via legislation, DRM, or litigious intimidation. The more generous explanation is that the industry recognizes that many uses promote consumer engagement, education, and investment, but that they see the danger of circumvention software as too powerful to allow it to be legitimized no matter the use. The industry actively argued against the request made on behalf of film professors to be able to clip DVDs, so clearly nobody is unaware of the potential benefits and legitimacy of such usage - but I’m not sure if it’s a case of paranoid protectionism or fear of a slippery slope.

Now I turn the question to you. We preach the power of active audiences and participatory culture, practices that depend on fair use and productive consumers. So how do you view fair use within business models? Do the strategies of lobbying and litigation pursued at the top of media industries represent more broadly held attitudes toward copyright, or is there dissent and diversity of opinions within the media industries that do not come to light in a public forum? Do you see strategies by which media educators can better make the case for the importance of fair use not only to our own efforts, but to fuel media consumption, audience engagement, and the education of future creators?

What’s your take?

Come to Picnic ‘06 Cross Media Week (Amsterdam)

Friday, July 14th, 2006

PICNIC ’06 Cross Media Week

PICNIC ’06 Cross Media Week is Amsterdam’s new annual event focused on creativity in cross media content and technology, specifically in the fields of entertainment and communication.
PICNIC ’06 is being organised under the direction of the Cross Media Week Foundation. The Foundation is mandated to bring together top creative professionals from around the world in Amsterdam to create new partnerships and opportunities, as well as to establish international networks.

PICNIC ’06 will take place from September 26 – 30 at the Westergasfabriek, a cultural facility located in a former gas factory. For more information, visit www.crossmediaweek.org

Speakers

Speakers will include top creatives and entrepreneurs such as Michael B. Johnson, Moving Picture Group Lead at Pixar Animation Studios, John de Mol, Co-Founder of Endemol and Founder of Talpa, Craig Newmark, Founder of craigslist, Philip Rosedale, Founder of Linden Lab/Second Life, Jamie Kantrowitz, Senior VP Marketing Europe at MySpace, and many more.

Program

The PICNIC ’06 program will showcase content delivered via TV, the Internet, mobile phones, gaming, virtual reality and music services. Delegates will discuss major trends related to media, art and science, see innovative content, formats and channels, and develop new opportunities. Sessions will include networking picnics, interactive plenary discussions, content showcases, demos and a wide variety of workshops.

To view the complete program, please visit www.crossmediaweek.org/program

Government Partners

City of Amsterdam and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs

Corporate Partners

MTV Networks, KPN, UPC, Liberty Global, chellomedia, KPMG, KLM, World Directories, Heineken, LB Icon, Sanoma Uitgevers and ilse media

Service Partners

Amsterdam Partners, Artmiks, KesselsKramer, Media Republic, nomadic | nomadic, Unit Creative Management Amsterdam, Viadesk, the Waag Society, Web Power, the Westergasfabriek and WhizPR

Event Partners

Association of Dutch Designers (BNO), Berkeley Cybersalon, European Archive, European Journalism Centre, Immovator Cross Media Network, Mediagilde, Mediamatic, Syntens, Virtual Institute for Research into Media Culture Amsterdam (VIRMA), Virtueel Platform, the Utrecht School of the Arts, and the Waag Society

To sign up for regular event updates, visit www.crossmediaweek.org/requestinfo

Academic consulting

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

There comes a time in the lives of many PhD students and young scholars when they go out and get short-term jobs with people outside the university - consulting, in other words. For some people consulting seems glamorous, for others tawdry. For me, it’s just work - my PhD is not funded, and given the choice, I’d rather work less for more money.

Key to successful consulting, though, are its business aspects - how much work you do, what you get paid for it, and when you get paid. Because of my experience doing a lot of professional consulting before my PhD, I’ve actually received training in this kind of thing! That’s what this post is about - hopefully it’ll be handy for others.

So, here’s a true story: one of my PhD colleagues was asked by a senior professor in her field to do some consulting work on a project in her field. The assignment was to interview a series of people around the south-east of England and write a report on her findings. The professor offered a lump sum of money, I think about £2500. She was torn - she wanted to do the research and work with the professor, and she could use the money, but she also wanted the time for her PhD. She asked me what I thought about it, and I asked her how much work she thought it was.

STEP ONE: prepare a short work plan for yourself, in half-days

In this case, there were 20 interviews. Those of you who have worked with interview data know that it’s not just an hour spent face-to-face with your interviewee. It also means setting up the interview, travelling to the place, and transcribing the interview afterwards, not to mention setting up the interview guide beforehand and potentially (let’s say in the case of grounded theory) doing analysis along the way. In this case the professor wasn’t willing to pay for a transciptionist, but would do all the interview setup. So I figure, half a day for interview and travel, another half-day for transcription. That’s 20 days.

Now comes the coding and analysis. This is harder to quantify but if it is a report rather than a nuanced theoretical analysis it’s a bit quicker. Say two weeks - 10 days.

Finally the meetings and presentation of results. The professor wanted her to travel out of London to the city where he was for three meetings during this time. Half day each - 1 1/2 days. Plus be available to answer email - another 1/2 day, probably. 2 days on project administration. Creating the presentation to go with the report document, 1 day. Total 3 days on meetings and administration.

So, our work plan says we need 33 days for this project. Personally, I always add a bit of contingency as project can, and do, spiral out of control. Say 35 days.

STEP TWO - work out your daily rate.

At £2,500 for 35 days, my friend was going to make £71.42 a day, or £8.92 an hour. To me, this is not an acceptable wage for a professional person with years of education and experience behind them. Not to mention she misses a month of work on her PhD. I advised her that if she really wanted to work with the professor, she should negotiate. She should aim to get AT LEAST £200 a day. When I was working professionally, I was often charged out to clients at £1,200 by my agency (not that I saw that kind of cash, but the point is clients are used to paying for services). I currently charge my clients around £500 a day. But how does a poor PhD student get those kind of rates?

STEP 3: Negotiate

Having assessed the amount of work and your rate, you need to think about your bottom line, what the negotiation specialists call the BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement). For example, my friend decided that if the professor wouldn’t negotiate, she would not take the job. In other cases the answer might be different. She decided she would take the job if her rate came up to £120 a day. Now there are several steps to this:

1) say that the work sounds very interesting and you’re sure you could do an excellent job for the client, seeing as you are experienced in these research techniques and this subject area, but that you’re concerned about the money;

2) take the client through the work plan and get them to agree that your estimate of the work involved is reasonable. For example, if the professor had said that indeed, the transciption work was paid for somewhere else, then that could take 10 days off your estimate. During this process, emphasise your skills and expertise.

3) say the amount you would ordinarily charge for this service. For example, “My usual day rate is £200 a day, so ordinarily a project of this size would be £7,000.” Don’t be ashamed of your rate. Don’t be put off by the fact that the client may say they don’t have the money. This indeed might be true, but on the other hand you should be able to charge a fair price for your services, which they also should acknowledge. Remember, you are not a burger-flipper, you are a highly skilled researcher with years of training.

4) explain again how much work this is, and how specialised and skilled it is. Boring, but effective.

5) now, negotiate the amount of work. Let’s say the professor actually really doesn’t mind who does the interviewing, but really wants you, with your skills and expertise, to write the report. Now you’re talking 15 days of work (admin and presentation are still present) for £2500 - result! Equivalent of £166 per day. Perhaps you don’t have to travel to the meetings but can do them on the phone, apart from the last one. Result! by shaving things this way you might turn this into a lovely piece of work.

6) if the client still baulks, explain again how much work and how skilled this is.

7) finally, but ONLY AFTER you have tried to reduce the amount of work, cut your prices. But only grudgingly. And in exchange for something else - like, can your work be paid in advance? Or, will this lead to a publication with your name on it? Or, can you use some of the data in your own research? It’s important not to just drop the price.

In the case of my friend, she ended up declining the work as stated (in accordance with her BATNA). However, some months later the professor called her up and offered her a much more lucrative position on a more interesting project. This happens quite a lot, actually.

Anyway hope this is helpful.

An academic’s toolkit

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

A fellow blog researcher has provided a handy list of her own favourite Internet and software productivity tools and has invited me (and some colleagues) to respond (one has already given her own list).To be honest though I think of myself as a near-compulsive collector of this kind of stuff, almost everything I use is already on one or the other of the two lists already. To their collection I would add:

  • Netvouz, a more feature-packed way to share and store bookmarks than any of the others I have looked at including del.icio.us - my collection now numbers 6540 - the public version is here and my collection of bookmarks tagged “academic” may be worth browsing.
  • Scopus from Elsevier is a better journal searching tool than Web of Knowledge with a much easier to use interface (though you need a subscription to be able to use either)
  • A9 from Amazon is a handy way to access the ‘read inside the book’ features offered by Amazon with fewer clicks.
  • I find Bloglines’ search seems to find links to blogs on a given subject area that other blog search engines miss but in truth I haven’t experimented extensively with the wide range of blog search tools available.
  • I did the survey that formed part of my thesis work using QuestionPro which has lots of handy features and offers academics one free unlimited use survey (though eventually your access to the results will expire so don’t forget to download them to SPSS!).
  • Go Digital and other “techtalk” podcasts (see the podcast section of the extensive resources along the right side of my personal blog). Primarily because they enable me to keep up with the tech news including blog-related stuff while I am doing the dishes or cycling around town rather than reading until my eyeballs bleed (though actually I do both!).
  • On that resources list you will also find a number of free PC software tools like anti-virus software and a link to a blog posting I made, gathering all the useful cheap and free Mac software I use (academic and otherwise).
  • Update: If you want to manage your thesis like you would a business project, you could use a web based project management tool like Basecamp or open source software like GanttProject 2
  • Not strictly a research tool but something absolutely necessary to the future of my research nonetheless - Synk - a piece of Mac software which helps me back my entire hard drive to a separate drive which I keep at the LSE so if our flat burns to the ground with my laptop in it I will still have a thesis to complete!

I hope this collection of goodies helps someone out there…